The aim of the paper is to uncover the extent to which different forms of political Internet humour can criticise current political affairs in a developing democracy such as Bosnia and Herzegovina. Specifically, applying a cognitive linguistic theory of meaning construction, namely conceptual integration theory, the paper analyses the construction of meaning of humorous Internet forms, such as memes, demotivational posters, hashtag posts, and memetic photographs, representing innovative ways of providing political commentaries on current political affairs. The meaning of political humour is constructed in conceptual blending as a basic cognitive mechanism. As it is claimed (Coulson & Pascual 2006, Coulson & Oakley 2006, Coulson 2006, Oakley & Coulson 2008) that blending can be used as a rhetorical tool influencing the audience to change the reality and even act upon it, the analysis of the construction of meaning of political humour as products of conceptual integration can reveal hidden ideologies in political discourse.
Berberović, S. & Delibegović Džanić, N. (2009). ‘Političari, dvorske dame i kajgana: Teorija konceptualne integracije i politički humor’, in Brdar, M, Omazić, M., Belaj, B. & Kuna, B. (eds.), Lingvistika javne komunikacije: Sociokulturni, pragmatički i stilski aspekti, Zagreb/Osijek: HDPL, pp. 139–153.
Berberović, S. & Delibegović Džanić, N. (2015). ‘Bitno je biti...? – Teorija konceptualne integracije i internetski politički memovi’, in Belaj, B. (ed.), Dimenzije značenja, Zagreb: Zagrebačka slavistička škola, pp. 9–30.
Bergen, B. (2004). ‘To awaken a sleeping giant: Blending and metaphor in editorial cartoons after September 11’, in Achard, M. & Kemmer, S. (eds.), Language, Culture, and Mind, Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 23–36.
Coulson, S. (1996). ‘The Menendez Brothers Virus: Analogical mapping in blended spaces’, in Goldberg, A. (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 67–81.
Coulson, S. (2002). ‘What's so funny: Conceptual blending in humorous examples’. Available at: http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~coulson/funstuff/funny.html
Coulson, S. (2005). ‘Extemporaneous blending: Conceptual integration in humorous discourse from talk radio’. Style 39, pp. 107–122.
Coulson, S. (2006). ‘Conceptual blending in thought, rhetoric, and ideology’, in Kristiansen, G., Achard, M., Dirven, R. & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 187–210.
Coulson, S. & Oakley, T. (2000). ‘Blending basics’. Cognitive Linguistics 11 (3/4), pp. 175–196.
Coulson, S. & Oakley, T. (2006). ‘Purple persuasion: Conceptual blending and deliberative rhetoric’, in Luchenbroers, J. (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics Investigations: Across Languages, Fields and Philosophical Boundaries. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 47–65.
Coulson, S. & Pascual, E. (2006). ‘For the sake of argument: Mourning the unborn and reviving the dead through conceptual blending’. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4, pp. 153–181.
Delibegović Džanić, N. (2013). ‘Who was born with a silver foot in his mouth? Modified idiomatic expressions in political cartoons’. Jezikoslovlje 14 (2-3), pp. 323–336.
Delibegović Džanić, N. & Berberović, S. (2010). ‘On politicians in big women’s sunglasses driving buses with their feet in mouths: Late-night political humour and conceptual integration theory’. Jezikoslovlje 11 (2), pp. 197–214.
Delibegović Džanić, N. & Berberović, S. (2014). ‘Hot cakes: The use of idioms in political cartoons’, in Jesenšek, V. & Dobrovol’skij, D. (eds.), Phraseology and Culture, Bielsko-Biala, Budapest, Kansas, Maribor; Praha: Zora, pp. 339–353.
Delibegović Džanić, N. & Omazić, M. (2011). ‘Conceptual blending in political cartoons’, in Tomović, N. & Vujić, J. (eds.), English Language and Literature Studies: Image, Identity, Reality, Belgrade: Faculty of Philology, University of Belgrade, pp. 51–64.
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Fauconnier, G. (2007). ‘Mental spaces’, in Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 351–376.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2000). ‘Compression and global insight’. Cognitive Linguistics 11 (3/4), pp. 283–304.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2006). ‘Conceptual integration networks’, in Geeraerts, D. (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 303–371. Reprint of ‘Conceptual integration networks’. (1998). Cognitive Science 22 (2), pp. 133–187.
Grady, J., Oakley, T. & Coulson, S. (1999). ‘Conceptual blending and metaphor’, in Gibbs, R. W. Jr. & Steen, G.J. (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 101–124.
Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson.
Kyratzis, S. (2003). ‘Laughing metaphorically: Metaphor and humour in discourse’. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Logroño, 20–25 July. Available at http://wwwling.arts.kuleuven.ac.be/iclc/Papers/Kyratzis.pdf.
Lundmark, C. (2003). ‘Puns and blending: The case of print advertisements’. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Logroño, 20–25 July. Available at http://wwwling.arts.kuleuven.ac.be/iclc/Papers/Lundmark.pdf.
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2003). ‘Humour as ideological struggle: The view from cognitive linguistics’. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Logroño, 20–25 July. Available at http://wwwling.arts.kuleuven.ac.be/iclc/Papers/JuanaMarinArrese.pdf.
Oakley, T. & Coulson, S. (2008). ‘Connecting the dots: Mental spaces and metaphoric language in discourse’, in Oakley, T. & Hougaard, A. (eds.), Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 27–50.
Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Turner, M. (2007). ‘Conceptual integration’, in Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 377–393.
Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (1995). ‘Conceptual integration and formal expression’. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10 (3), pp. 183–204.
Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (1999). ‘A mechanism of creativity’. Poetics Today 20(3), pp. 297–418.
Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (2003). ‘Metaphor, metonymy, and binding’, in Dirven, R. & Pörings, R. (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 469–487.