Fifty people compiled diaries in which they described the sounds of their daily life in cities around the world. Of the 940 hours of observation there were 200 entries that referred to sounds of laughter, both live and recorded. The participants of the research always identified laughter sounds explicitly, unlike other urban sounds. The sound of laughter has a powerful cultural-symbolic superstructure. Learning how we use laughter, what we hear and how we react when someone laughs can help us to understand the key processes taking place in the urban space today. Laughter can at once attract and repel, signal danger and relieve social tension. It can lead equally to social agents’ inclusion and exclusion in the situation of interaction, and can largely determine the form and extent of their inclusion. A citizen’s interpretation of the sound of laughter depends directly on the media technologies which predominate in the urban environment and channel their cultural experience and sonic imagination.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, New York: Verso.
Augé, M. (1992). Non-lieux, Introduction à une Anthropologie de la Surmodernité. Paris: Seuil.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1965). Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i Narodnaia Kul’tura Srednevekov’ia i Renessansa [Creativity of Francois Rabelais and Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance]. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaia literatura.
Culhane, D. (2016). ‘Imagining: an introduction’ & ‘Sensing’, in Elliott, D. & Culhane, D. (eds.), A Different Kind of Ethnography. Imaginative Practices and Creative Methods, North York, Tonawanda: University of Toronto Press, Higher Education Division, pp. 1- 21 and pp. 45-67.
Eriksen, T. H. (2007). Globalisation: The Key Concepts. Oxford: Berg.
Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. Columbia University Press.
Kuropjatnik, A. I. & Kuropjatnik, M. S. (2018). ‘Interkul’turalizm: postmul’tikul’tural’nyi diskurs sotsial’noi integratsii [Interculturalism: Postmulticultural discourse of social integration]’. RUDN Journal of Sociology 18 (2), pp. 250-261.
Likhachev, D. S., Panchenko A. M. & Ponyrko N. V. (1984). Smekh v Drevnei Rusi [Laughter in Antient Rus]. Leningrad: Nauka.
Logutov, A. (2017). ‘Zvukovye praktiki i material’nost’ gorodskogo prostranstva [Sonic practices and the materiality of urban space]’, Urban Studies and Practices 2 (4 (9)), pp. 39-50.
Mayorova, K. (2017). ‘Urban Sound Studies: novye osnovaniia gorodskikh issledovanii [Urban Sound Studies: new horizons for studying the urban]’. Urban Studies and Practices 2 (4 (9)), pp. 11-19.
McLuhan, M. (1965). The Gutenberg Galaxy. The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Melchior-Bonnet, S. (1994). Histoire du Miroir. Paris: Editions Imago.
Mifdal, M. (2019). ‘Breaking frame and frame-shifting in Bassem Youssef’s satirical TV show al-Bernāmeg’. The European Journal of Humour Research 7 (2), pp. 30-43.
Moretti, M. (2016). ‘Walking’, in Elliott, D. & Culhane, D. (eds.), A Different Kind of Ethnography. Imaginative Practices and Creative Methods, North York, Tonawanda: University of Toronto Press, Higher Education Division, pp. 91-111.
Oldenburg, R. (1999). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. New York: Da Capo Press.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1940). ‘On joking relationships’. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 13 (3), pp. 195-210.
Schafer, R. M. (1977). The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. New York: Knopf.
Stern, J. (2012). ‘Sonic imaginations’, in Stern, J. (ed.), The Sound Studies Reader, London, New York: Routledge, pp. 1-17.
Taussig, M. (1993). Mimesis and Alterity. New York: Routledge.
Turner, V. W. (1969). The Ritual Process. Structure and Anti-structure. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. London and New York: Routledge.
Vertovec, S. (2007). ‘Super-diversity and its implications’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6), pp. 1024-1054.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 The European Journal of Humour Research