Both artistic and comic


Louis François Cazamian
Henri Bergson

How to Cite

Ševčík, M. (2021). Both artistic and comic: the status and significance of humour in the context of Louis Cazamian’s writings. The European Journal of Humour Research, 9(4), 74–90.


This study examines Louis Cazamian’s considerations on the nature of humour, which were influenced by Bergson’s theory of the comic as a contrast between life and automatism and Bergson’s idea of humour as a specific type of comic linguistic transposition. In this context, the paper draws attention to the critical function of humour in Cazamian’s understanding based on his embracing of Bergson’s conception of laughter as a critique of the automation of life. However, Cazamian’s speculating diverges from Bergson’s thoughts on humour and leads to the creation of an elaborated theory. Cazamian states that humour has an artistic status and attributes characteristics to it that Bergson attributes to works of art. In contrast to Bergson, who emphasises the distinction between art and the comic, Cazamian deems humour’s critical aspect to accord with its artistic status. While humour is attributed artistic status because it suggests the multifaceted or elusive character of reality, humour’s comic character entails ridiculing the inability or unwillingness to respect that reality has a comic character.


Amir, L. (2019). Philosophy, Humor, and the Human Condition: Taking Ridicule Seriously. Cham: Palgrave.

Andrews, M. (2013). Dickensian Laughter: Essays on Dickens and Humour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baldensperger, F. (1907). ‘Les Définitions de l’humour’, in Baldensperger, F., Études d’histoire littéraire. Paris: Librairie Hachette, pp. 176-222.

Berger, A. A. (1995). Blind Men and Elephants: Perspectives on Humor. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Bergson, H. (1910). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Bergson, H. (1914). Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Bergson, H. (1920). ‘Intellectual effort’, in Bergson, H., Mind-Energy: Lectures and Essays. London: Henry Holt, pp. 186-230.

Castelain, M. (1925/1926). ‘Ne peut-on vraiment définir l’humour’. Revue anglo-américaine 4, pp. 193-207.

Cazamian, L. (1903). Le roman social en Angleterre 1830–1850. Paris: Georges Bellais.

Cazamian, L. (1906). ‘Pourquoi nous ne pouvons définir l’humour’. Revue germanique 2, pp. 601-634.

Cazamian, L. (1913). Études de psychologie littéraire. Paris: Payot.

Cazamian, L. (1920). L’évolution psychologique et la littérature en Angleterre. Paris: Félix Alcan.

Cazamian, L. (1929). Criticism in Making. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Cazamian, L. (1932). Carlyle. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Cazamian, L. (1938a). ‘Humour et amour’, in Cazamian, L., Essais en deux langues. Paris: Didier, pp. 141-147.

Cazamian, L. (1938b). ‘L’humour de New-York’, in Cazamian, L., Essais en deux langues. Paris: Didier, pp. 149-161.

Cazamian, L. (1942). L’humour anglais. Paris: Didier.

Cazamian, L. (1945). L’Humour de Shakespeare. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.

Cazamian, L. (1952). The Development of English Humor, Parts I and II. Durham: Duke University Press.

Critchley, S. (2002). On Humour. London and New York: Routledge.

Ford, R. (2018). ‘Life’s joke: Bergson, comedy, and the meaning of laughter’, in Moland, L. L. (ed.), All Too Human: Laughter, Humor and Comedy in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, Boston: Springer, pp. 175-94.

France, A. (1919). Amethyst Ring. London: John Lane.

Gifford, P. (1981). ‘Humour and the French mind: Towards a reciprocal definition’. The Modern Language Review 76, pp. 534-548.

Legouis, E. & Cazamian, L. (1924). Histoire de la littérature anglaise. Paris: Hachette.

Lovasz, A. (2020). ‘Enlivening Society: Life as Elasticity in Henri Bergson’s Le rire’. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 16 (2), pp. 198-244.

Parovel, G. Guidi, S. (2015). ‘The psychophysics of comic: Effects of incongruity in causality and animacy’. Acta Psychologica 159, pp. 22-32.

Pons, E. (1954). ‘Une interpretation de l’humour’. Études anglaises 7, pp. 80-88.

Saroglou, V. (2002). ‘Religion and sense of humor: An a priori incompatibility? Theoretical considerations from a psychological perspective’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 15 (2), pp. 191-214.

Ševčík, M. (2020). ‘Význam humoru v kontextu úvah Louise Cazamiana’. Filosofický časopis, 68 (3), pp. 361-386.

Stern, A. (2009). The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swift, J. (2015). A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People in Ireland from Being a Burden to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Public. London: Penguin Books.

Twain, M. (2005). The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Cheswold: Prestwick House.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 The European Journal of Humour Research


Download data is not yet available.