On the "Dark Side"



How to Cite

Mullan, K. (2022). On the "Dark Side": Facebook humour used for inclusion and exclusion. The European Journal of Humour Research, 10(2), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2022.10.2.644


This study examines the use of online humour in a subversive local community Facebook group set up in 2017 by disgruntled members banned from a similar group “in opposition to [the original group’s] arbitrarily-applied rules, [its] enforced happiness, and [its] suppression of any post that isn't about giving away lemons or asking to borrow small appliances”. The dissatisfaction with the guidelines and the administration of the original Facebook group provides rich material for humorous posts in the new group, many with varying degrees of aggression directed at the founder and certain members of the “Dark Side”, as the original group is frequently referred to. 

This article will demonstrate how the use of humour in this new rival Facebook group is used for the purposes of inclusion and exclusion, and how it contributes to a sense of belonging in this online community of practice (Lave & Wenger 1991) created by a small group of self-declared dissidents. It will be shown how the humour shapes the identity of the group through the members’ shared ideologies and beliefs (Tanskanen 2018), and how the humorous messages intended to denigrate and belittle the “Dark Side” reinforce unity among the group members, since the feeling of superiority over those being ridiculed coexists with a feeling of belonging (Billig 2005).

Fifteen single comments or multi-post threads were chosen for analysis. These appeared during the first twenty months of this rival group’s existence, and included primarily affiliative and/or aggressive humour (Meyer 2015) directed at the original group. The analysis was carried out using elements of computer-mediated discourse analysis (Herring 2004), and an insider participant-observer online ethnographic approach. The examples chosen illustrate how the humour is used to unite the members of this subversive group by dividing them from the original one, to create the joking culture (Fine and de Soucey 2005) of the new group, and in so doing, creates and sustains the members’ shared identity as irreverent breakaway troublemakers.



Baym, N.K. (1995). ‘The performance of humor in computer‐mediated communication’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1995.tb00327.x.

Baym, N.K. (2011). ‘Social Networks 2.0’, in Consalvo, M. & Ess, C. (eds.), The Handbook of Internet Studies, Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 384-405.

Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humor. London: Sage.

Boxer, D. & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). ‘From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display’. Journal of Pragmatics 27 (3), pp. 275–294.

Boyd, D.M. & Ellison, N.B. (2007). ‘Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1), pp. 210–230.

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). ‘Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach’.

Discourse Studies 7 (4–5), pp. 585–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407.

Chovanec, J. (2012). ‘Conversational humour and joint fantasizing in online journalism’, in Chovanec, J. & Ermida, I. (eds.) Language and Humour in the Media. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 139-161. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303057948_Conversational_humour_and_joint_fantasizing_in_online_journalism [accessed Jul 07 2021].

Cooper, C. (2008). ‘Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model.’ Human Relations 61 (8), pp. 1087–1115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094861

Crawford, K. (2009). ‘Listening as participation: Social media and metaphors of hearing online’, in The Good, The Bad and The Challenging: The User and The Future of Information and Communication Technologies, COST 298 Conference journal. Copenhagen: COST.

Demjén, Z. (2018). ‘Complexity theory and conversational humour: Tracing the birth and decline of a running joke in an online cancer support community’. Journal of Pragmatics 133, pp. 93-104.

de Souza, C.S. & Preece, J. (2004). ‘A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities’. Interacting with Computers 16 (3), pp. 579-610.

Duncan, W. F. (1982). ‘Humor in management: Prospects for administrative practice and research’. Academy of Management Review 7, pp. 136-142.

Dynel, M. (2013). ‘Impoliteness as disaffiliative humour in film talk’, in Dynel, M. (ed.), Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105–144.

Dynel, M. (2021). ‘Desperately seeking intentions: Genuine and jocular insults on social media’. Journal of Pragmatics 179, pp. 26-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.017.

Dynel, M. & Poppi, F. (2020). ‘Quid rides?: Targets and referents of RoastMe insults’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 33 (4), pp. 535-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humor-2019-0070.

Fiadotava, A. (2021). ‘“We came for the Sluts, but stayed for the Slutsk”: FK Slutsk Worldwide Facebook page between ironic and genuine football fandom’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 34 (2), pp. 259-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humor-2021-0007.

Ferguson, M. & Ford, T. (2008). ‘Disparagement humour: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 21, pp. 283–312.

Fine, G.A & Soucey, M. de. (2005). ‘Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 18 (1), pp. 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.1.1.

Goddard, C. (2009). ‘Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence’. Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (1), pp. 29–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.002.

Goddard, C., & Cramer, R. (2016). ‘“Laid back” and “irreverent”: An ethnopragmatic analysis of two cultural themes in Australian English communication’, in Carbaugh, D. (ed.), Handbook of Communication in Cross-cultural Perspective, New York: Routledge, pp. 89–103.

Hay, J. (2001). ‘The pragmatics of humor support’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 14 (1), pp. 55-82.

Herring, S.C. (2004). ‘Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An approach to researching online behaviour’, in Barab, S. A., Kling, R. & Gray, J. H. (eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338-376.

Holmes, J. & Marra, M. (2002). ‘Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 15 (1), pp. 65-87.

Hübler, M.T. & Bell, D.C. (2003). ‘Computer-mediated humor and ethos: Exploring threads of constitutive laughter in online communities’. Computers and Composition 20 (3), pp. 277-294.

Lambert Graham, S. (2016). ‘Relationality, friendship, and identity in digital communication’, in Georgakopoulou, A. & Spilioti, T. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, London: Routledge, pp. 305–319.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meyer, J. C. (2000). ‘Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication’. Communication Theory 10 (3), pp. 310-331.

Meyer, J. C. (2015). Understanding Humor Through Communication: Why Be Funny, Anyway? Lanham: Lexington.

Mullan, K. (2020). 'Pile of Dead Leaves Free to a Good Home: Humour and Belonging in a Facebook Community', in Mullan, K, Peeters, B. & Sadow, L (eds.), Studies in ethnopragmatics, cultural semantics, and intercultural communication. Volume 1: Ethnopragmatics and Semantic Analysis, Singapore: Springer, pp. 135-159.

Robert, C. (2014). ‘Social network’, in Attardo, S. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 708-710.

Robinson, D. T. & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). ‘Getting a laugh: Gender, status, and humor in task discussions’. Social Forces 80, pp. 123–160.

Schwämmlein, E. & Wodzicki, K. (2012). ‘‘What to tell about me?’ Self-presentation in online communities’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (4), pp. 387-407.

Sinanan, J., & McDonald, T. (2018). ‘Ethnography’, in Burgess, J., Marwick, A. & Poell, T. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, London: Sage, pp. 179–195.

Stallone, L., & Haugh, M. (2017). ‘Joint fantasising as relational practice in Brazilian Portuguese interactions’. Language & Communication 55, pp. 10–23.

Suler, J. (2004). ‘The online disinhibition effect’. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 7 (3), pp. 321-326.

Tagg, C., Seargeant, P. & Brown, A.A. (2017). Taking Offence on Social Media: Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tanskanen, S-K. (2018). ‘Identity and metapragmatic acts in a student forum discussion thread’, in Bös, B., Kleinke, S., Mollin, S. & Hernandez, N. (eds.), The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.133-151.

Yus, F. (2018). ‘Positive non-humorous effects of humor on the internet’, in Tsakona, V. & Chovanec, J. (eds.), The Dynamics of Interactional Humor, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.283-303.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 The European Journal of Humour Research


Download data is not yet available.