This study aims to provide an overview of humorous travel-related memes shared during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 80 Internet memes were content analysed for emergent themes. The findings reveal three major themes: playful aggression, making fun of one’s longing for travel, and making fun of new travel realities. The identified themes were linked to the existing literature to better understand the memes being studied. The analysis of memes provides a methodologically agile way to study conditions that may otherwise be overlooked, e.g., peoples’ travel-related desires and concerns while in lockdown.
Boerner, M., Stephen, J. & Murphy, D. (2017). ‘The association between sense of humour and trauma-related mental health outcomes: two exploratory studies’. Journal of Loss and Trauma 22, pp. 440-452.
Cauberghe, V., Van Wesenbeeck, I., De Jans, S., Hudders, L. & Ponnet, K. (2021). ‘How adolescents use social media to cope with feelings of loneliness and anxiety during COVID-19 lockdown’. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking 24 (4), pp. 250-257.
Cohen, E. (2010). ‘Confirmation versus contestation of tourism theories in tourist jokes’. Tourism Analysis 15, pp. 3-16.
Coleman, E.G. (2012). ‘Phreaks, hackers, and trolls and the politics of transgression and spectacle’, in M. Mandiberg (ed.), The Social Media Reader. New York: New York University Press, pp. 99-119.
Flecha Ortiz, J. A., Santos Corrada, M. A., Lopez, E. & Dones, V. (2021). ‘Analysis of the use of memes as an exponent of collective coping during COVID-19 in Puerto Rico’. Media International Australia 178 (1), pp. 168-181.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). ‘The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions’. American Psychologist 56 (3), pp. 218-226.
Freund, A. (2013). ‘I can has voice? A semiotic study of internet memes and their reflection of culture’. Semiotics, pp. 127-139.
Ge, J. (2019). ‘Social media-based visual humour use in tourism marketing: a semiotic perspective’. The European Journal of Humour Research 7 (3), pp. 6–25.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
Kuiper, N. A., McKenzie, S. D. & Belanger, K. A. (1995). ‘Cognitive appraisals and individual differences in sense of humour: motivational and affective implications’. Personality & Individual Differences 19 (3), pp. 359–372.
Martin, R. A. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Markham, A. & Stavrova, S. (2016). ‘Internet/digital research’, in D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative Research, London: Sage, pp. 229-244.
McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humor: Its Origin and Development. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Moran, C. C. & Massam, M. M. (1999). ‘Differential influences of coping humour and humour bias on mood’. Behavioural Medicine 25, pp. 36-42.
Morreall, J. (1983). Taking Laughter Seriously. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Shifman, L. (2013). ‘Memes in a digital world. Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (3), pp. 362-377.
Yhee Y., Goo J., & Koo C. (2021). ‘Meme tourism: a conceptual framework’, in Wörndl, W., Koo, C., & Stienmetz J. L. (eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, Cham: Springer, pp. 328-333.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 The European Journal of Humour Research