The idea of this research was born on 26 May 2022. The following day, we saw Elon Musk’s tweet from 26 May 2022: ‘Politics is a sadness generator’. We accepted the challenge to refute the statement and to prove that there is much space for humour in the political discourse. The study focuses on humorous tweets produced in the period of the first 100 days of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and the criteria according to which they may be classified for further analysis. The literature overview proves that humour has been extensively approached by different researchers from a multidisciplinary perspective; in particular, numerous attempts were made to classify humour and its manifestations. In this research, we approached the Twitter activity of Ukrainian politicians as fragments of political discourse. In particular, we extracted humorous tweets and organised a sample that underwent further categorisation and interpretation with reference to existing typologies and theories of humour. The study discusses the roles the politicians assume while producing and spreading humour on Twitter, features the key subject fields and objects of ridicule in the wartime tweets, gives an insight into the communicative value of such tweets and suggests potential readership classes. Finally, the study seeks to prove the flexibility and adaptability of humour styles to the socio-political context and wartime communication that project public aggressiveness, self-relief and self-enhancement
Anderson, E. (2019). Humour and Representation in British Literature of the First World War (1914–18) [PhD dissertation]. Newcastle University.
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219029
Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (First American Edition, ed. by Urmson, J. O.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bizi, S., Keinan, G. & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1988). ‘Humor and coping with stress: A test under real-life conditions’. Personality and Individual Differences 9 (6), pp. 951–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(88)90128-6
Bruns, A. & Moe, H. (2014). ‘Structural layers of communication on Twitter’, in Weller, K. et al. (eds.), Twitter and Society Vol. 89, New York: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 15–28.
Carpenter, W. (2010). ‘Laughter in a time of tragedy: examining humor during the Holocaust’. Denison Journal of Religion 9, pp. 12-25.
Condren, C. (2012). ‘Satire and definition’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 25 (4), pp. 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2012-0019
Crawford, C. (1994). ‘Theory and implications regarding the utilization of strategic humor by leaders’. Journal of Leadership Studies 1 (4), pp. 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199400100406
Delporte, C. (2001). ‘Humour as a strategy in propaganda film: the case of a French cartoon from 1944’. Journal of European Studies 31 (123), pp. 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/004724410103112313
Dickason, R. (2015). ‘The nuanced comic perspectives of the cartoons in Mr. Punch’s history of the Great War’, in Tholas-Disset, C. & K.A. Ritzenhoff (eds.), Humor, Entertainment, and Popular Culture during World War I, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137436436_8
Dunne-Lynch, N. (2007). Humour ‘and defiance: Irish troops and their humour in the Peninsular War’. Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research 85 (341), pp. 62–78.
Dynel, M. (2009a). ‘Beyond a joke: types of conversational humour’. Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (5), pp. 1284–1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00152.x
Dynel, M. (2009b). ‘Creative metaphor is a birthday cake: metaphor as the source of humour’. Metaphorik.De. Retrieved 16 September 2022, from https://www.metaphorik.de/sites/www.metaphorik.de/files/journal-pdf/17_2009_dynel.pdf?iframe=true&width=100%25&height=100%25.
Hay, J. (1995). Gender and Humour: Beyond a Joke [MA thesis]. Victoria University of Wellington.
Hewitson, M. (2012). ‘Black humour: caricature in wartime’. Oxford German Studies 41 (2), pp. 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1179/0078719112z.00000000013
Holman, V. & Kelly, D. (2001). ‘Introduction. War in the twentieth century: the functioning of humour in cultural representation’. Journal of European Studies 31 (123), pp. 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/004724410103112301
Holmes, J. (2000). ‘Politeness, power and provocation: how humour functions in the workplace’. Discourse Studies 2 (2), pp. 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002
Krikmann, A. (2006). ‘Contemporary linguistic theories of humour’. Folklore. Electronic Journal of Folklore 33, pp. 27–58.
Kuczok, M., Stwora, A. & Świerkot, M. (2020). ‘Introduction to Explorations in Humor Studies: Humor Research Project’, in Kuczok, M., Stwora, A. & Świerkot, M. (eds.), Explorations in Humor Studies: Humor Research Project. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 1–15.
Kuipers, G. (2015). ‘Satire and dignity’, in Drees, M. & de Leeuw, S. (eds.) Power of Satire, Topics in Humor Research 2, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.2.02kui
Le Naour, J.-Y. (2001). ‘Laughter and tears in the Great War: the need for laughter/the guilt of humour’. Journal of European Studies 31 (123), pp. 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/004724410103112302
Lintott, S. (2016). ‘Superiority in humor theory’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (4), pp. 347–358.
Lloyd, C. (2001). ‘Comic songs in the Occupation’. Journal of European Studies 31 (123), pp. 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/004724410103112308
Lyczba, F. (2015). ‘Hoaxes, ballyhoo stunts, war, and other jokes: humor in the American marketing of Hollywood war films during the Great War’, in Tholas-Disset, C. & K.A. Ritzenhoff (eds.), Humor, Entertainment, and Popular Culture during World War I, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137436436_4
Maclean, F., Jones, D., Carin-Levy, G. & Hunter, H. (2013). ‘Understanding Twitter’. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 76 (6), pp. 295–298. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802213x13706169933021
Martin, R., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J. & Weir, K. (2003). ‘Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: development of the humor styles questionnaire’. Journal of Research in Personality 37 (1), pp. 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00534-2
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/39517.
Mendiburo-Seguel, A. & Heintz, S. (2020). ‘Comic styles and their relation to the sense of humor, humor appreciation, acceptability of prejudice, humorous self-image and happiness’. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 33 (3), pp. 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2018-0151
Merziger, P. (2007). ‘Humour in Nazi Germany: resistance and propaganda? The popular desire for an all-embracing laughter’. International Review of Social History 52, pp. 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859007003240.
Milne, L. (2016). Laughter and War: Humorous-satirical Magazines in Britain, France, Germany and Russia 1914-1918. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Morreall, J. (2020). ‘Philosophy of humor’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive. Retrieved January 29, 2023, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/humor/
Mullen, J. (2015). ‘“You can’t help laughing, can you?” Humor and symbolic empowerment in British music hall song during the Great War’, in Tholas-Disset, C. & K.A. Ritzenhoff (eds.), Humor, Entertainment, and Popular Culture during World War I, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137436436_12
Norrick, N. R. (2003). ‘Issues in conversational joking’. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (9), pp. 1333–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00180-7
Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (2009). ‘The discourse-historical approach’. In Wodak, R. & Meyer., M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed.. Sage Publications, pp. 87–121.
Ristovic, M. (2020). ‘War, humour and propaganda (1914-1918)’, in War and Humour 1914-1918 (in Serbian and English), pp. 18–42.
Robertshaw, A. (2001). ‘“Irrepressible chirpy cockney chappies”? Humour as an aid to survival’. Journal of European Studies 31 (123), pp. 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/004724410103112303
Romero, E. J. & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). ‘The use of humor in the workplace’. Academy of Management Perspectives 20 (2), pp. 58–69. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.20591005
Ruch, W. (2008). ‘Psychology of humor’, in Raskin. V. (ed.), The Primer of Humor Research, Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17–100. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-6447
Ruch, W., Heintz, S., Platt, T., Wagner, L., & Proyer, R. T. (2018). ‘Broadening humor: Comic styles differentially tap into temperament, character, and ability’. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00006
Schmidt-Hidding, W. (1963). Europäische Schlüsselwörter: Humor und Witz (Band I). München: Hueber.
Smith, M. (2017). ‘The perception and interpretation of irony and sarcasm: how varying levels of common ground affects perception and interpretation of irony and sarcasm’. NANOPDF. https://nanopdf.com/download/use-of-irony-and-sarcasm-michael-l-smith-hci-professional_pdf
Üngör, U. Ü., Verkerke, V. (2015). ‘Funny as hell: he functions of humour during and after genocide’. The European Journal of Humour Research, 3 (2/3), pp. 80–101.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). ‘What is political discourse analysis?’ Political Linguistics 11, pp. 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
Webb, B. V. (2019). ‘‘Hitler must be laughed at!’: The PCA, propaganda and the perils of parody during wartime’. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 39, pp. 749–767. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01439685.2018.1543756
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 The European Journal of Humour Research