“It’s not a joke!” Bio-art and the aesthetics of humour

Isabel de Sena Cortabitarte

Abstract


An analysis of the rhetoric and aesthetics of humour in Adam Zaretsky’s oeuvre will attest to bio-art’s capacity to open up a new critical space within the life sciences debate – one of the most pertinent and conflicted fields of polemic today. In this paper I assert that in bio-art, the use of humour as a rhetorical tool holds the potential to bring ambiguous, non-normative perspectives into ethical questions that arise from developments in the life sciences (that field concerned with the study of living organisms and the advancement of life-altering interventions, such as bio-engineering and genetic manipulation). Departing from Henri Bergson and Arthur Schopenhauer’s Incongruity Theories, as well as John Morreall’s Play Theory, I analyze the performative force of humour in the artistic practice of self-proclaimed mad scientist and misbehaving ethicist Adam Zaretsky. Through this case study I argue that the disengaged mode of engagement evoked by aesthetic humour – the kind of humour that is not instrumentalized for practical concerns, but rather of intrinsic value, inciting imagination, insight, and reflection in the person experiencing it – is crucial in allowing art to move beyond the more normative, rationalized moralism of academic discourse and embody multiple, or even paradoxical perspectives simultaneously.

 


Keywords


aesthetic humour, Adam Zaretsky, bio-art

Full Text:

VIEW FULL TEXT HERE

References


Adam Zaretsky (biography). Available online: www.fondation-langlois.org/html/e/page.php?NumPage=264 [Accessed on 18 September 2014].

Bergson, H. (1911 [1900]). Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. New York: Macmillan. Accessed via: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4352. (Original title: Le Rire. Essai sur la Signification du Comique. Translated by Brereton, C.).

Campbell, L. (2012). ‘‘No laughing matter’: Humour and contemporary art practice’, Artvehicle 62. Available online: www.artvehicle.com/feature/27 [Accessed on on 8 April 2013].

EMutagen: Workhorse Zoo. Available online: http://emutagen.com/wrkhzoo.html [Accessed on 5 June 2013].

Gaut, B. (1998). ‘Just joking: The ethics and aesthetics of humor’, Philosophy and Literature 22 (1), pp. 51–68.

Gordon, M. (2012). ‘What Makes Humor Aesthetic?’, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2 (2), pp. 62–70.

Henri Bergson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Available online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Bergson [Accessed 6 June 2013].

Klein, S. (2007). Art and Laughter. London, New York: Macmillan.

Martin, M.W. (1983). ‘Humour and aesthetic enjoyment of incongruities’, British Journal of Aesthetics 23 (1), pp. 74–85.

Meyer, J.C. (2000) ‘Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication’, Communication Theory 10 (3), pp. 310–331.

Mitchell, W.J.T. (2003). ‘The work of art in the age of biocybernetic reproduction’, MODERNISM/modernity 10 (3), pp. 481–500.

Morreall, J. (2009). ‘Fight or flight – or laughter: The psychology of humor’, Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 27–39.

Schopenhauer, A. (1883 [1818]). ‘Chapter VIII. On the theory of the ludicrous’, The World as Will and Idea: Vol.2. Edinburgh: Ballantyne Press, pp.265–278. (Original title: Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Translated by Haldane, R.B.; Kemp, J.).

Schopenhauer, A. (1958 [1818]). ‘§13’, The World as Will and Representation: Vol.1. New York: Dover Publications, pp.58–61. (Original title: Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Translated by Payne, E.F.J.).

Wolfson, W. (2002). ‘Bio-artist Adam Zaretsky sleeps with the fishes. Using nature to create art’, Red Herring. Available online: emutagen.com/downloads/adamzaretsky.pdf [Accessed on 5 May 2013].

Yablonsky, L. (2004). ‘What’s so funny about contemporary art?’, ARTnews, 01 September 2004. Available online: www.artnews.com/2004/09/01/whats-so-funny-about-contemporary-art/, [Accessed on 12 April 2013].

Zaretsky, A. (2004). ‘Viva Vivo! Living art is dead’, Leonardo 37 (1), pp. 90–92.

Ziarek, K. (2004). ‘Ars tecnica: From futurism to Internet and transgenic art’, The Force of Art. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 60–102.

Zwijnenberg, R. (2012). ‘A two-headed zebrafish – Some personal observations on the relevance and urgency of collaborations between art, science and technology’, Möbius 1 (1), pp.1–14.

Zylinska, J. (2009). ‘Green bunnies and speaking ears: The ethics of bioart’, Bioethics in the Age of New Media. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, pp.149–176.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2015.3.2.3.desenacortabitarte

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication ethics and malpractice statement