Comedy and humour: an ethical perspective

Mehrdad Bidgoli

Abstract


In this essay, I aim to study comedy and humour from an ethical perspective. My main proposal is that comedy and humour can be understood alternatively in the light of ethics, and in one sense, they actually begin, more effectively, with an ethical sensibility. Effective comedy and humour initiate through an ethical sensibility called “hospitality”; ideally, they are preceded by this ethical openness. I will argue that it is this pre-original ethical hospitality and openness that can give rise to more effective moments of comedy, humour, carnival, festivity and also laughter, opening the Self to the Other in order to be able to enter into a disinterested humorous (dialogic) experience. Hospitality is of prime importance here because it turns out to be part and parcel of comedy as it also underlies the ethics of alterity. I therefore suggest that the thoughts of both Emmanuel Levinas and Mikhail Bakhtin can give rise to a fruitful study of ethics, comedy and humour. I will “reduce” socio-political complexities of our daily life-world to comic moments through Bakhtin, and then expose the reader to a Levinasian simplicity and ethical openness that actually takes place before effective comedy and humour can begin. In this essay, I mainly have literary/critical aims, and to fulfil that aim, I will briefly discuss two Shakespearean works and contextualize my thesis. The matter of studying comedy, humour and ethics in a broader cultural, social and/or philosophical context is open for other thinkers.


Keywords


alterity; carnival; comedy; ethics; Emmanuel Levinas; hospitality; humour; Mikhail Bakhtin; openness

Full Text:

VIEW FULL TEXT

References


Aristotle (1996). Poetics. Heath, M. (trans.), London: Penguin Books.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Holquist, M. & Emerson, C. (eds. & trans.), Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984a). ‘Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics’. In Emerson, C. (ed. & trans.), Theory and History of Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984b). Rabelais and His World. Iswolsky, H. (trans.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Holquist, M. & Liapunov, V. (eds.), Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bergson, H. (1980). Laughter. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bidgoli, M. (2020). ‘Ethical comicality and the Fool: an essay on King Lear’. Comedy Studies. DOI: 10.1080/2040610X.2020.1729491

Bloom, H. (2003). Hamlet: Poem Unlimited. New York: Riverhead Books.

Chattoo, C. B. (2018). ‘A funny matter: toward a framework for understanding the function of comedy in social change’. Humor, pp. 1-25.

Clarke, R. F. (1965). The Growth and Nature of Drama. London: Cambridge University Press.

Critchley, S. (2000). ‘Demanding approval: on the ethics of Alain Badiou’. Radical Philosophy 100, pp. 16-27.

Critchley, S. (2002). On Humour. London: Routledge.

Derrida, J. (1999). Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas. Brault, P-A. & Naas, M. (trans.), California: Stanford University Press.

Erdinast-Vulcan, D. (2008). ‘Between the face and the voice: Bakhtin meets Levinas’. Continental Philosophy Review 41, pp. 43-58.

Gold, M., Goodhart S. & Lehnhof, K. (2018). Of Levinas and Shakespeare: “To See Another Thus”. Indiana: Purdue University Press.

Holquist, M. (2002). Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World (second edition). London: Routledge.

Lane, R. J. (2006). Fifty Key Literary Theorists. Oxon & NY: Routledge.

Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity. Lingis, A. (trans), Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. (1987a). Collected Philosophical Papers. Lingis, A. (trans.), Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Levinas, E. (1987b). Time and the Other (and Additional Essays). Cohen, R. A. (trans.), Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. (1988). ‘The paradox of morality: an interview with Emmanuel Levinas’, In Bernasconi, R. & Wood, D. (eds.), The Provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the Other.

Benjamin, A. & Wright, T. (trans.), London & NY: Routledge, pp. 168-180.

Levinas, E. (1991). Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence. Lingis, A. (trans.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Levinas, E. (1998). Entre-Nous: on Thinking-of-the-Other. Smith, M. B. & Harshav, B. (trans.), New York: Columbia University Press.

Murray, J. W. (2000). ‘Bakhtinian answerability and Levinasian responsibility: forging a fuller dialogical communicative ethics’. Southern Communication Journal 65 (2-3), pp. 133-150.

Nealon, J. T. (1997). ‘The ethics of dialogue: Bakhtin and Levinas’. College English 59 (2), pp. 129-148.

Pinchevski, A. 2005. ‘The ethics of interruption: toward a Levinasian philosophy of communication’. Social Semiotics 15(2), pp. 211-234.

Shakespeare, W. (2009a) [1934]. Hamlet, prince of Denmark. Wilson, J. D. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shakespeare, W. (2009b) [1960]. King Lear. Wilson, J. D. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shaw, C. (2014). Satyric Play: The Evolution of Greek Comedy and Satyr Drama. London: Oxford University Press.

Sills, L. (2017). ‘The phenomenology of the funny: a diagrammatical proposal’. Comedy Studies 8 (1), pp. 2-12.

Steinby, L. & Klapuri, T. (2013). ‘The acting subject of Bakhtin’, In Steinby, L. & Klapuri, T. (eds.), Bakhtin and His Others. London: Anthem Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2020.8.1.bidgoli

Refbacks



Publication ethics and malpractice statement