Humour as political aesthetics in street protests during the political Ice Age

How to Cite

Tunali, T. (2020). Humour as political aesthetics in street protests during the political Ice Age. The European Journal of Humour Research, 8(2), 129–145.


This article analyses humour as a part of carnival aesthetics in urban social movements. It regards humour’s place in street protests as an aesthetic experience that brings forth an interplay of joy, imagination and freedom. Drawing from social movement theory regarding collective identity and collectivism, aesthetic theory and Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory of carnivalesque, this paper examines the link between humour and carnival aesthetics in recent social movements. It argues that carnival laughter initiates a process of symbiosis that opens relationships with others and allows recognition of democratic diversity, aesthetic sensibility and political dignity—essential for the reconstruction of a new space that is resistant to the politically imposed world crisis. It asks: could humour be one of the social catalysts we need during the authoritarian turn in a political Ice Age instigated by conservative populism? Drawing on examples from the Gezi Movement in Turkey in 2013, the article demonstrates how humour is not just a tool to consolidate solidarities but a definitive aesthetic experience that, in the context of the street protests, becomes the antidote to hegemonic-sense-making mechanisms and the greyness of our collective thinking.


Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic: Lying in Politics; Civil Disobedience; On Violence; Thoughts on Politics and Revolution. Houghton: Mifflin Harcourt.

Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. Harcourt Brace Javanovich: New York.

Bakhtin, M. (1984.) Rabelais and His World. Trans. H. Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Bakhtin, M. 2002. Karnavaldan Romana. İstanbul: Ayrıntı.

Bernal, Victoria. (2013). ‘Please forget democracy and justice: Eritrean politics and the powers of humor.’ American Ethnologist 40 (2), pp. 300–309.

Bey, H. (1985). TAZ: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism. New York, Autonomedia.

Bruff, I. (2012). ‘Authoritarian neoliberalism, the Occupy Movements, and IPE.’ Journal of Critical Globalization Studies 5, pp. 114-116.

Bruner, L. M. (2005). ‘Carnivalesque protest and the humorless state.’ Text and Performance Quarterly 25 (2), pp. 136-155.

Bogad. L.M. (2010). ‘Carnivals against capital. Radical clowning and the global justice movement.’ Sociology. Accessed March 12, 2020.

Charny, I. W. (2006). Fascism and Democracy in the Human Mind: A Bridge Between Mind and Society. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Davies C. (2007). ‘Humor and protest: jokes under communism’ in Hart, M. & Bos, D. (eds.) Humor and Social Protest. Cambridge University Press, pp. 291-309.

Dardot, P. & Laval, C. Common: On Revolution in the Twenty-First Century. London: Bloomsbury.

Downing, J. D.H. (2001). Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Douzinas, C.. (2013). Philosophy and Resistance in the Crisis: Greece and the Future of Europe. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Eagleton, T. (2009 [1981]). Walter Benjamin, or Towards a Revolutionary Criticism. New York: Verso Books.

Fominaya, C. (2007). ‘The role of humour in the process of collective identity formation in autonomous social movement groups in contemporary Madrid’, International Review of Social History, Humour and Social Protest 52, pp. 243-258.

Furedi, F. (2019). ‘Clown world: Extinction Rebellion is a carnival for middle classes who love to dress up as activists.’ October 7, 2019. Accessed November 12, 2019.

Georgalidou, M. (2011). ‘‘Stop caressing the ears of the hooded’: Political humour in times of conflict,’ in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 83-107.

Graeber, D. (2007). ‘On the phenomenology of giant puppets: broken windows, imaginary jars of urine, and the cosmological role of the police in American culture” in Graeber, D. (ed.), Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion and Desire, Oakland, CA: AK Press.

Graeber, D. (2010). “The new anarchists.” New Left Review 13. Accessed October 10, 2011.

Griffin, R. (1991) The Nature of Fascism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Griffin, R. (2006). “The breath of the possible” in Biddle, E., Graeber, D. & Shukaitis, S.(eds.). Constituent Imagination:,Militant Investigation, Collective Theorizations, Oakland, CA: AK Press.

Grindon, G. (2004). ‘Carnival against capital: a comparison of Bakhtin, Vaneigem and Bey’, Anarchist Studies 12, pp. 147-161.

Gordon, M. (2012). ‘Exploring the relationship between humor and aesthetic experience.’ The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 46 (1), pp. 110-121.

Guardian (2019). ‘’Older generations can’t understand’: XR Youth on Being heard.’ Accessed

December 2019.

Harvey, D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.

Hart, M. (2007). Humor and Social Protest: An Introduction. International Review of Social History. Accessed November 12, 2013.

Hart, M. & Bos, D.. (2007). Humor and Social Protest. Cambridge University Press.

Hardt, M. & Negri A. (2012). Declaration. Accessed 12 January 2013.

Haugerud, A. (2012). ‘Satire and dissent in the age of billionaires.’ Social Research 79 (1), pp. 145-168

Holloway, J. (2010). Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto Press.

Holloway, J. (2002). Change the World without Taking Power. London: Pluto Press.

Kaptan, Y. (2016). ‘Laugh and resist! Humor and satire use in the Gezi resistance movement.’ Perspectives on Global Development and Technology. Vol. 15. Accessed December 23, 2017.

Kahraman, H.B. Postmodernite ile Modernite Arasında Turkiye: 1980 Sonrası Zihinsel, Toplumsal, Siyasal Dönüşüm. Istanbul: Agora Kitaplığı, 2007.

Konda (2014), Gezi Raporu: Toplumun ’Gezi Parki Olaylari’ Algisi. Gezi Parkindkailer Kimlerdi? Konda Arastirma Ve Danismanlik. Accessed 24 January 2018.

Konda. Gezi Parkı Araştırması (2014). Accessed August 14, 2013,

Kutz-Flamenbaum, R.V. (2014). ‘Humor and social movements.’ Sociology Compass 8 (3), pp. 294–304.

Mahiye, S. D. (2016). ‘Down with some things! The politics of humor and humor as politics in Turkey’s Gezi protests’, Etnofoor 28 (1), pp. 11-34.

Martin, D.-C. (2001). ‘Politics behind the mask: Studying contemporary carnivals in political perspective.’ Questions de Recherche/Research in Question 2, pp. 16-25.

Mersal, I. (2011). ‘Revolutionary humor.’ Globalizations 8, pp. 669-674.

Morreall, J. (1981). ‘Humor and aesthetic education.’ Journal of Aesthetic Education 15 (1), pp. 55-70.

Mulkay, M. (1988). On Humor Its Nature and Its Place in Society. Cambridge, Polity Press.

Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2006). ‘Priming effects of late-night comedy’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18, pp. 198–210.

Notes from Nowhere, ed. (2003). We Are Everywhere: The Irresistible Rise of Global Anti-capitalism. London and New York: Verso.

Örs, I. R. and Turan, Ö.. (2015). ‘The manner of contention: the pluralism at Gezi.’ Philosophy & Social Criticism 41 (4-5), pp. 453-463.

Perrin, E. Ö, Çoban B. & Şener, G. (2013). ‘Humorous form of protest: disproportionate use of intelligence in Gezi Park’s resistance.” Unpublished paper presented at the Conference Political Science in the 21st Century: New Opportunities and Impasses Theorising and Experiencing Politics October 31 to November 2, 2013. Istanbul, Turkey.

Powell, C., and Paton, G.E.C. eds. (1988). Humour in Society: Resistance and Control. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Rosanvallon, P.. (2006). Democracy Past and Future, ed. by S. Moyn. New York: Columbia University Press.

Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the Art of Resistance. New Haven. Yale University Press.

Sørensen, M. J. (2008). ‘Humor as a serious strategy of nonviolent resistance to oppression.’ Peace & Change 33, pp. 167-190.

Soner, C. (2020). Erdogan’s Empire: Turkey and the Politics of the Middle East, New York: Tauris.

Taş, H.. (2015). ‘Turkey –From Tutelery to Delegative Democracy’, Third World Quarterly 36, pp. 776-791.

Taşkale, A. R. (2014). “Gezi revolt: critique, courage.’ Society and Space. Accessed

February 11, 2019.

Temelkuran, E. (2019). How to Lose a Country: The 7 Steps from Democracy to Dictatorship, Sydney: Harper Collins.

Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (2011a). ‘Humour in politics and the politics of humour: An introduction,’ in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1-30.

Tunalı, T., (2018), ‘Art of resistance: carnival aesthetics and the Gezi street protests’, ASAP: Journal of the Association for the Study of the Arts of the Present (Special Issue: Rules of Engagement: Art, Process, Protest) 3 (2), pp. 377-399.

Wallerstein, I. (2013). ‘Uprisings here, there, and everywhere.’ Fernand Braudel Center: Commentaries No. 356. Accessed July 1, 2013,

Žižek, S. (2013). ‘Trouble in Paradise,’ London Review of Books 35/14 (2013), pp. 11-12.

Vaneigem, R. (1994) The Revolution of Everyday Life. London: Left Bank Books.

Virno, P. (2007). ‘Multitude between innovation and negation.’ Semiotext(e), Los Angeles, CA.

Yeğenoğlu, M. (2013), ‘Smells like Gezi spirit: democratic sensibilities and carnivalesque politics in Turkey,’ Radical Philosophy 182, pp. 2-3.

Young, D. G. (2017), ‘Theories and effects of political humour: Discounting cues, gateways, and the impact of incongruities’. September 2014. Accessed. March 12, 2020.

Ziv, A. (1988) “Humor as a social corrective,” in Behrens, L. & Rosen, L.J.(eds.), Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

All authors agree to an Attribution Non-Commercial Non Derivative Creative Commons License on their work.


Download data is not yet available.