Editorial: “Anything goes?”

Mike Lloyd

Abstract


Editorial: “Anything goes?”

Editorial: “Anything Goes?”


Keywords


limits, alteration, description, humorous mode

Full Text:

VIEW FULL TEXT HERE

References


Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and Ridicule. London: Sage.

Davies, C. (1998). Jokes and Their Relations to Society. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Diffee, M. (2011). The Best of the Rejection Collection: 293 Cartoons That Were Too Dumb, Too Dark, or Too Naughty for the New Yorker. New York: Workman.

Francis, D. & Hester, S. (2004). An Invitation to Ethnomethodology. London: Sage.

Freud, S. (1960). Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Gilbert, J.R. (2004). Performing Marginality: Humor, Gender and Cultural Critique. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Goffman, E. (1961) ‘Fun in Games’, in Goffman, E., Encounters, Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 15-72.

Goldstein, D. (2003). Laughter Out of Place: Race, Class, Violence and Sexuality in a Rio Shantytown. Berkeley: University of California Press.

de Groen, F. & Kirkpatrick, P. (2009) Serious Frolic: Essays on Australian Humour. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

Jenkins, R. (1994) Subversive Humour: The Liberating Power of Humor. New York: Free Press.

Kuipers, G. (2006). Good Humour, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lockyer, S. & Pickering, M. (2005). Beyond the Joke: The Limits of Humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

McHoul, A.W. (1983). ‘Announcing: A contribution to the critique of information systems models of human communication’. Human Studies 6, pp. 279-294.

Mankoff, R. (2011). ‘Foreword’, in Diffee, M., The Best of the Rejection Collection: 293 Cartoons That Were Too Dumb, Too Dark, or Too Naughty for the New Yorker, New York: Workman, pp. vii-viii.

Mindess, H. (2010). Laughter and Liberation. Edison: Transaction.

Morreall, J. (1983). Taking Laughter Seriously. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Mulkay, M. (1988). On Humour. Cambridge: Polity.

Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Raban, N. (2008). ‘Interview: John Cleese’. URL: http://www.avclub.com/articles/john-cleese,14197/ [Accessed 23 November 2011].

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schmidt, S. (2014). Seriously Funny: Mexican Political Jokes as Social Resistance. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Schutz, A. (1962). Collected Papers, Vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Hijhoff.

Sharrock, W.W. & Anderson, R.J. (1991). ‘Epistemology: Professional scepticism’, in Button, G. (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51-76.

Smithies, G. (2014). ‘On the offensive’. Sunday Star Times, 14 September, p. E40.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2014.2.4.lloyd

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication ethics and malpractice statement