Editorial: Confronting power with laughter

Villy Tsakona, Diana Elena Popa

Abstract


Editorial

Full Text:

VIEW FULL TEXT HERE

References


Archakis, A. & Tsakona, V. (2011). ‘Informal talk in formal settings: Humorous narratives in Greek parliamentary debates,’ in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 61-81.

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. (2012). ‘Political humour, senselessness, and pragmatic irresponsibility.’ Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Humour in Conventional and Unconventional Politics (ICHCUP), Dunarea de Jos University, Galaţi, Romania, 5-8 November.

Avidar, R. (2012). ‘How a politician can successfully use self-humour and apply public relations principles online: An Israeli case study.’ Israeli Journal of Humour Research, 1 (2), pp. 81-96.

Bayley, P. (2004). ‘Introduction. The whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary discourse,’ in Bayley, P. (ed.), Cross Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1-44.

Braun, A. & Preiser, S. (2013). ‘The impact of disparaging humour content on the funniness of political jokes.’ Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 26 (2), pp. 249-275.

Dynel, M. (2011). ‘Entertaining and enraging: The functions of verbal violence in broadcast political debates,’ in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 109-133.

El Refaie, E. (2011). ‘The pragmatics of humour reception: Young people’s responses to a newspaper cartoon.’ Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 24 (1), pp. 87-108.

Fairclough, I. & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advanced Students. London & New York: Routledge.

Fetzer, A. & Lauerbach, G. E. (eds.) (2007). Political Discourse in the Media. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Georgalidou, M. (2011). ‘“Stop caressing the ears of the hooded”: Political humour in times of conflict,’ in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 83-107.

Hill, J. H. (1995). ‘Junk Spanish, covert racism, and the (leaky) boundary between public and private spheres.’ Pragmatics, 5 (2), pp. 197-212.

Kramer, E. (2011). ‘The playful is political: The metapragmatics of internet rape-joke arguments.’ Language in Society, 40 (2), pp. 137-168.

Laineste, L. (2011). ‘Politics of taste in a post-Socialist state: A case study,’ in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 217-241.

Mueller, R. (2011). ‘Fun in the German parliament?,’ in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 33-59.

Popa, D. E. (2011). ‘Political satire dies last: A study on democracy, opinion formation, and political satire,’ in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 137-165.

Radcliffe-Brown, A. (1952). Structure and Function in a Primitive Society. London: Cohen & West.

Raskin, V. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humour. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Ritchie, L. D. (2011). ‘“You’re lying to Jesus!”: Humour and play in a discussion about homelessness.’ Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 24 (4), pp. 481-511.

Seirlis, J. K. (2011). ‘Laughing all the way to freedom?: Contemporary stand-up comedy and democracy in South Africa.’ Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 24 (4), pp. 513-530.

Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd expanded ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

Stewart, C. O. (2013). ‘Strategies of verbal irony in visual satire: Reading The New Yorker’s “Politics of Fear” cover.’ Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 26 (2), pp. 197-217.

Tsakona, V. (to appear). ‘Okras and the metapragmatic stereotypes of humour: Towards an expansion of the GTVH,’ in Dynel, M. (ed.), Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (2011a). ‘Humour in politics and the politics of humour: An introduction,’ in Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.), Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1-30.

Tsakona, V. & Popa, D. E. (eds.) (2011b). Studies in Political Humor: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Westwood, R. I. & Johnston, A. (2013). ‘Humour in organisation: From function to resistance.’ Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 26 (2), pp. 219-247.

Yoong, D. (2012). ‘The case of humour in the Malaysian House of Representatives.’ Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 25 (3), 263-283.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.2.tsakona

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication ethics and malpractice statement