Book review: Dynel, Marta (2013). Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 425 pp.

Rus Violeta Ioana

Abstract


Book review: Dynel, Marta (2013). Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 425 pp.

Keywords


Humour; Jokes; Theories of humour;

Full Text:

VIEW FULL TEXT HERE

References


Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. and Raskin, V. (1991). ‘Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humour 4(3/4): 293–347.

Bell, N. D. (2009). ‘Responses to failed humor’. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1825–1836.

Burgoon J. K. and Hale, J. L. (1988). ‘Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors”. Communication Monographs 55: 58–79

Keith-Spiegel, P. (1972). ‘Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues’, in Goldstein, J & McGhee, P. E. (eds.), Psychology of Humor, New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–39

Martin, R. A. (2007). The Psychology of Humour: An Integrative Approach. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press.

Priego-Valverde, B. (2009). ‘Failed humour in conversation. A double voicing conversation’, in Norrick, N. R. & Chiaro, D. (eds.), Humor in Interaction, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamin, pp. 165–184.

Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanism of Humour. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Suls, J. (1983). ‘Cognitive processes in humour appreciation’, in McGhee, P. & Goldstein, J. (eds.), Handbook of Humour Research (Vol. 1), New York: Springer, pp. 39–57.

van Djik, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication ethics and malpractice statement