Keywords
politics
democracy
Jürgen Habermas
reason
How to Cite
Abstract
In this article, which serves as an introduction to a special issue on humor and the public sphere, we argue that humor has become increasingly central to public discourse in the 21st century, and that this necessitates a rethinking of the relationship between humor and the public sphere in contemporary democracies. In the article, we bring together the dispersed academic literature on humor and the public sphere, and show how humor and comedy scholars have engaged with the long-standing academic debate around this contested concept, which was coined by Jürgen Habermas in 1962. We also introduce the eleven contributions to this special issue and situate them within this ongoing debate.
References
Attardo, S. (2023). Humor 2.0: How the Internet changed humor. Anthem Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Indiana University Press.
Basu, S. (1999). Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor. Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(4), 378-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00082.
Baumgartner, J. (2024). Political humor. In T. Ford, W. Chlopicki & G. Kuipers (Eds.), De Gruyter handbook of humor studies (pp. 455-466). De Gruyter.
Baym, G. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006492.
Bergson, H. (1911). Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. MacMillan.
Benacka, E. (2016). Rhetoric, humor, and the public sphere: From Socrates to Stephen Colbert. Lexington Books.
Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. Sage.
Boukes, M., Boomgaarden, H.G., Moorman, M. & de Vreese, C.H. (2015). At odds: Laughing and thinking? The appreciation, processing, and persuasiveness of political satire. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12173
Bouvier, G. & Rosenbaum, J. (2020). Communication in the age of Twitter: The nature of online deliberation. In G. Bouvier & J. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation (pp. 1-22). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bruns, A. (2023). From “the” public sphere to a network of publics: Towards an empirically founded model of contemporary public communication spaces. Communication Theory, 33(2/3), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad007.
Capelotti, J. (2024). Satire and parody. In T. Ford, W. Chlopicki & G. Kuipers (Eds.), De Gruyter handbook of humor studies (pp. 317-333). De Gruyter.
Chevrette, R. & Duerringer C. (2020). Bros before Donald Trump: Resisting and replicating hegemonic ideologies in the #BROTUS memes after the 2016 election. In G. Bouvier & J. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation (pp. 235-265). Palgrave Macmillan.
Chiaro, D., Chlopicki, W. & Kuipers, G. (Eds.) (2022). Humour in the public sphere. URL: www.humorinpublic.eu/www.humourinpublic.eu.
Condren, C. (2002). Between social constraint and the public sphere: On misreading early-modern political satire. Contemporary Political Theatre, 1(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300016.
Dahl, J. (2021). Voices on the border: Comedy and integration in the Scandinavian public spheres. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen].
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240.
Gardiner, M. (2004). Wild publics and grotesque symposiums: Habermas and Bakhtin on dialogue, everyday life and the public sphere. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 24-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00472.x.
Habermas, J. (1982). A reply to my critics. In J. Thompson & D. Held (Eds.), Habermas: Critical debates (pp. 219-283). MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1992). Further reflections on the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 421-461). MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Three normative models of democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 21-30). Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x.
Habermas, J. (2022). [1962]. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Polity Press.
Hobbes, T. (1999). Human nature and De Corpere Politico. Oxford University Press.
Holm, N. (2017). Humour as politics: The political aesthetics of contemporary comedy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Koivukoski, J. (2022). Political humor in the hybrid media environment: Studies on journalistic satire and amusing advocacy. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki].
Kuipers, G. (2008). The sociology of humor. In V. Raskin (Ed.), The primer of humor research (pp. 361-398). Mouton de Gruyter.
Kuipers, G. (2011). The politics of humour in the public sphere: Cartoons, power and modernity in the first transnational humour scandal. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410370072.
Kuipers, G. (2015). Satire and dignity. In M.M. Drees & S. de Leeuw (Eds.), The Power of Satire (pp. 19-32). John Benjamins.
Kuipers, G. (forthcoming, 2025). Humor and polarization. In R. Antonini, C. Bucaria & L. Rossato (Eds.), Humour, translation, food, and other indispensable things: The influence of Delia Chiaro’s work. Bloomsbury.
Lippert, L. (2022). Neoliberal feminisms, late-night comedy, and the public sphere, or: Samantha Bee takes on Ivanka Trump. Feminist Media Studies, 23(4), 1872-1887. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1998182.
Lockyer, S., & Pickering, M. (eds.). (2005). Beyond a joke: The limits of humour. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lockyer, S. & Weaver, S. (2024). The ethics of humor and comedy. In T. Ford, W. Chlopicki & G. Kuipers (Eds.), De Gruyter handbook of humor studies (pp. 527-544). De Gruyter.
Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745-758.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso.
Nieuwenhuis, I. & Zijp, D. (2022). The politics and aesthetics of humour in an age of comic controversy. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(2), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494221084118.
Pérez, R. (2022). The souls of white jokes: How racist humor fuels white supremacy. Stanford University Press.
Peruško, Z. (2021). Public sphere in hybrid media systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Javnost - The Public, 28, 36-52.
Quirk, S. (2018). The politics of British stand-up comedy: The new alternative. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rally to restore sanity. (2010, September 18). Retrieved March 22, 2024, from https://web.archive.org/web/20101004110901/http://www.rallytorestoresanity.com/.
Reiljan, A. (2020). ‘Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe: Affective polarisation in European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2), 376-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12351.
Risse, T. (2014). Introduction. In T. Risse (Ed.), European public spheres: Politics is back (pp. 1-25). Cambridge University Press.
Rodriguez, N. (2020). #FamilyTravelHacks: Humor and political commentary in hashtag hijacking. In G. Bouvier & J. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation (pp. 267-290). Palgrave Macmillan.
Schneiders, P., Stegmann, D. & Stark, B. (2023). Social cohesion in platformized public spheres: Toward a conceptual framework. Communication Theory, 33(2-3), 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad002.
Simpson, P. (2003). On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour. John Benjamins.
Smyrnaios, N., & Ratinaud, P. (2017). The Charlie Hebdo attacks on Twitter: A comparative analysis of a political controversy in English and French. Social Media+Society, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117693647.
Steffen, J. & Gold, M. (2010, October 31). Team sanity numbers more than 200,000, by some estimates. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 27, 2024, from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-oct-31-la-na-stewart-rally-20101101-story.html.
Susen, S. (2011). Critical notes on Habermas’s theory of the public sphere. Sociological Analysis, 5(1), 37-62.
Tsakona, V. (2019). Talking about humor, racism, and anti-racism in class: A critical literacy proposal. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies, 12(61)(2), 111-141. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.pcs.2019.61.12.14
Tsakona, V. (2020a). Recontextualizing humor: Rethinking the analysis and teaching of humor. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511929
Tsakona, V. (2020b). Scrutinizing intertextuality in humour: Moving beyond cultural literacy and towards critical literacy. The European Journal of Humour Research, 8(3), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2020.8.3.Tsakona2
Weaver, S. (2011). The rhetoric of racist humour: US, UK and global race joking. Ashgate.
Zijp, D. (2023). Comedians without a cause: The politics and aesthetics of humour in Dutch cabaret (1966-2020). [Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University].
Zijp, D. (2024). Rashi Bhargava and Richa Chilana: Punching up in stand-up comedy: speaking truth to power. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 37(1), 149-153. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1515/humor-2023-0062.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 The European Journal of Humour Research