Does religion shape people’s sense of humour? A comparative study of humour appreciation among members of different religions and nonbelievers

Karl-Heinz Ott, Bernard Schweizer

Abstract


Using an empirical approach, this study addresses the question whether followers of different religious beliefs (Christians, Muslims, and Hindus), as well as Atheists and Agnostics manifest different senses of humour when rating a variety of jokes. The study further investigates whether one’s religious background influences the threshold of what is considered offensive. And finally, it seeks to answer whether jokes targeting religions other than one’s own are always perceived as funnier. Analysing the results of a public survey (N=783) containing a blend of religious and non-religious jokes (including irreverent ones), we found that Hindus demonstrate overall the highest humour appreciation among all the groups, while Christians were the least amused by the jokes presented on the survey. Muslims had overall robust humour responses, despite reporting the highest incidence of being offended. Atheists were the least likely to be offended, and they generally enjoyed irreverent jokes. All groups agreed that if a joke was seen as offensive, its funniness was reduced.


Keywords


humor appreciation; Christian; Hindu; Muslim; Atheist; Agnostic

Full Text:

VIEW FULL TEXT HERE

References


Abrams, J. R., Bippus, A. M., & McGaughey, K. J. (2015). ‘Gender disparaging jokes: An investigation of sexist-nonstereotypical jokes on funniness, typicality, and the moderating role of ingroup identification’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 28(2), pp. 311-326.

Althusser, L. (1971). ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatuses’, in Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays. Ben Brewster (trans.), London: Verso, pp. 121-176.

Alwin, D.F., Felson, J.L., Walker E.T. & Tufis, P.A. (2006). ‘Measuring religious identities in surveys’. Public Opinion Quarterly 70(4), pp. 530-564.

Arbuckle, G. A. (2008). Laughing with God: Humor, Culture and Transformation. Collegeville, NM: Liturgical Press.

Berger, P. (1997). Redeeming Laughter: The Comic Dimension of Human Experience. New York: De Gruyter.

Braun, A. & Preiser, S. (2013). ‘The impact of disparaging humour content on the funniness of political jokes’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 26(2), pp. 249-275.

Burridge, R.A. (2015). ‘The Church of England’s Life of Python—or “What the Bishop Saw”, in Taylor, J.E. (ed.) Jesus and Brian: Exploring the Historical Jesus and his Times via Monty Python’s Life of Brian. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 19-41.

Crump, M, McDonnel J.V., & Gureckis, T.M. (2013). ‘Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioural research’. PLOS (8/3), pp. 1-18. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410

Cunningham, W.A., & Derks, P. (2005). ‘Humour appreciation and latency of comprehension’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 18(4), pp. 389-403.

Davies, B. & R. Harré (1990). ‘The discursive production of selves’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1), pp. 43-63.

Elst, K. (2011). ‘Humour in Hinduism,’ in Geybels, H. & Van Herck, W. (eds.) Humour and Religion: Challenges and Ambiguities. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 35-53.

Ford, T., Lappi, S.K., O’Connor, E.C. & Banos, N.C. (2017). ‘Manipulating humour styles: Engaging in self-enhancing humour reduces state anxiety’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 30(2), pp. 169-191.

Geybels, H. (2011). ‘The redemptive power of humour in religion’, in Geybels, H. & Van Herck, W. (eds.) Humour and Religion: Challenges and Ambiguities. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 11-21.

Hall, S. (1996). “Introduction: Who needs identity?’ in Hall S. & du Gay P. (eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity, London: Sage Publications, pp. 1-17.

Hirzalla, F, & von Zoonen, L. (2016). ‘”The Muslims are coming”: The enactment of morality in activist Muslim comedy’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 29(2), pp. 261-278.

Khan, Y. (2007). “Does Islam have a sense of humour?” BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7102519.stm.

Kuipers, G. (2011). ‘The politics of humour in the public sphere: Cartoons, power and modernity in the first translational humour scandal’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 14(1), pp. 63-80.

Kuschel, K.J. (1994). Laughter: A Theological Reflection. London: SCM Press.

Maiolino, N. & Kuiper, N. (2016). ‘Examining the impact of a brief humour exercise on psychological well-being’. Translational Issues in Psychological Science 2(1), pp. 4-13.

Martin, G.N., Sadler, S.J., Barrett, C.E. & Beaven, A. (2008). ‘Measuring responses to humour: How the testing context affects individuals’ reaction to comedy’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 21(2), pp. 143-155.

Martin, J, SR. (2011). Between Heaven and Mirth: Why Joy, Humour, and Laughter Are at the Heart of the Spiritual Life. New York: Harper One.

Martin, R.A., Puhlik-Doris, P, Larsen, G., Gray, J. & Weir K. (2003). ‘Individual differences in uses of humour and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humour Styles Questionnaire’. Journal of Research in Personality 37, pp. 48-75.

Marzolph, U. (2011). “The Muslim sense of humour’, in Geybels, H. & van Herck, W. (eds.), Humour and Religion: Challenges and Ambiguities, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 169-187.

Mason, W. & Suri. S. (2012). ‘Conducting behavioural research on Amazon Mechanical Turk’. Behavioural Research 44(1), pp. 1-23. Doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6.

Merritt, J. (2015). ‘Why Christians need to laugh at themselves’. The Atlantic Monthly, December 12, 2015.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/why-christians-need-to-laugh-at-themselves/420048/.

Morreall, J. (1999). Comedy, Tragedy, and Religion. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Rand, D. G. (2011). ‘The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labour markets can help theorists run behavioural experiments’. Journal of Theoretical Biology, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004

Rouse, S.V. (2014) ‘A reliability analysis of Mechanical Turk data.’ Computers in Human Behaviour 43, pp. 304-307.

Saroglou, V. (2002). ‘Religion and sense of humour: An a priori incompatibility? Theoretical considerations from a psychological perspective’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 15(2), pp. 191-214.

Saroglou, V. & Jaspard, J.M. (2001). ‘Does religion affect humour creation? An experimental study’. Mental Health, Religion & Culture 4(1), pp. 33-46.

Schweizer, B., & Ott K.H. (2016). ‘Laughter and faith: Do practicing Christians and atheists have different senses of humour?’ Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 29(3), pp. 413-438.

Siegel, L. (1987). Laughing Matters: Comic Tradition in India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Stieger, S., Formann, A.K., & Burger C. (2011). ‘Humour styles and their relationship to implicit and explicit self-esteem’. Personality and Individual Differences 50, pp. 747-759.

Wilson, G.D. (1990). ‘Ideology and humour preferences’. International Political Science Review 11(4), pp. 461-472.

Yue, X.D. (2011). ‘The Chinese ambivalence to humour: Views from undergraduates in Hong Kong and China’. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 24(4), pp. 463-480.

Zimbardo, Z. (2014). ‘Cultural politics of humour in (de)normalising islamophobic stereotypes’. Islamophobia Studies Journal 2(1), pp. 59-81.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2018.6.1.ott

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publication ethics and malpractice statement